​

           

 

                         Duygu Yasam

Special for

New York Art, New

​

Auctions doing presentations with the manipulations all over the world as well as in Turkey. If you're looking at a nearly exact copy of a famous artist Sothebyoths or Christie auctions are shown with big money. Moreover, the work of the artist was born in 1980. In this case, I think it is a shame to talk about art because the value of a work of art should be determined by the real art value of that work of art. In recent years, when contemporary art has embraced the whole world, we have hardly seen the amazing works that can be considered new and have really aesthetic value. what we see is not different from the enlarged examples of biblos that are marketed in souvenir shops until yesterday. Those who seek to direct art are not necessarily mistaken if every ugly and odd occurrence is to cast aside the artworks of the past by counting contemporary art. Because, it should be a valid explanation of why art is a work that is claimed to be an artistic one, even though it is art and contemporary. Otherwise, it would be in the air, so it's a shame we talk about art. When Gerhard Richter was sold at a great price in auctions, young artists immediately emerged with Richter-like work, and even in museums, Richter-like copy work began to be sold in large numbers. Of course there is nothing to say if there is a buyer, what do we say the implications of manipulation?

Very crazy examples in contemporary art are done once and must remain there. For example, the artist's garbage bag was put into the garbage bag of a museum, but we see that the same black garbage bag filled with things as art fairs at a variety of art galleries are marketed by big money. So what is the logic of that, can someone tell me? What is this, not a nonsense? OK, it is similar to what an artist does or does the same, but it doesn't matter who has done it before and who made that piece of art or work first? Or why is the gallery representing the copy artist when it turns out to be a copy and still trying to represent that artist? We can ask such a lot of questions and the ones who are going to art history from the art examples made today will be removed and today those who invest in art must take this into account.